방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [J Gynecol Oncol .] Pattern of practice for postoperative management of endometrial cancer in Korea: a survey by the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KGOG 2028-KROG 2104)

    국립암센터, 성균관의대 / 이성욱, 김주영*, 김민규*

  • 출처
    J Gynecol Oncol .
  • 등재일
    2023 Jul
  • 저널이슈번호
    34(4):e54.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Objective: This study aimed to investigate the current status of postoperative management of uterine endometrial cancer (EC) in Korea.

    Methods: A mail survey was administered to members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and Korean Radiation Oncology Group. A total of 38 gynecologic cancer surgeons (GYNs) and 31 radiation oncologists (RO) in 43 institutions was responded. The questionnaire consisted of general questions for clinical decision and clinical case questions. The GYN and RO responses were compared using chi-square statistics.

    Results: The 2 expert groups had similar responses for clinical decision based on the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-249 and Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Carcinoma-III trials in the early-stage EC. In contrast, the responses based on GOG-258 results differed, as GYNs most frequently opted for sequential chemotherapy (CTx) and radiotherapy (RT), while ROs preferred concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced stage (p<0.05). Based on the GOG-258, GYNs preferred CTx alone for adjuvant treatment of serous or clear cell adenocarcinoma histology, whereas ROs advocated for combined CTx and RT (sequential or concurrent). Among the clinical case questions, GYNs were more likely than ROs to choose CTx alone rather than the combination of CTx and RT (sequential or concurrent) as the answers to case questions representing patients with locally advanced stage or unfavorable histology (all p<0.05).

    Conclusion: The present study showed several different opinions of GYNs and ROs regarding adjuvant treatment for EC, particularly for adjuvant RT in advanced stage or unfavorable histology.

     

     

    Affiliations

    Sung Uk Lee 1, Joo-Young Kim 2, Min Kyu Kim 3, Young Seok Kim 4, Yeon Joo Kim 4, Keun-Yong Eom 5, Chan Woo Wee 6
    1Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
    2Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. jooyoungcasa@ncc.re.kr.
    3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea. minkyukim@skku.edu.
    4Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    5Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
    6Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

  • 편집위원

    부인종양 산부인과 전문의와 방사선종양학 전문의들에게 질문지를 배부하여 받은 응답을 통해, 현재 한국에서 자궁내막암의 수술 후 치료의 상황을 알 수 있는 연구임. 최근 시행된 대규모 트라이얼에 기반하여 질의한 결과, 산부인과 전문의와 방사선종양학과 전문의 사이에 국소 진행형, 예후가 안 좋은 조직형 자궁내막암에서 수술 후 치료와 관련하여, 산부인과 전문의는 serous/clear cell adenoca에 대해 항암치료 단독을 선호하는 반면 방사선종양학과 전문의는 항암 방사선치료 병용을 선호하는 등 그 차이가 유의하게 보여짐. 향후 최적의 치료를 위해 지속적인 연구 노력과 전문가 간의 활발한 소통이 필수적으로 필요할 것이라 생각됨.

    2023-09-06 11:05:34

  • 편집위원2

    Endometrial cancer에 대한 수술 후 치료방법에 대한 산부인과 의사와 방사선종양학과 사이이 의견 차이가 발생할 수 있는데 일반적인 가이드라인에서 알 수 없는 부분에 대해서 자세한 설문문항과 증례로 알려주는 흥미로운 연구입니다.

    2023-09-06 11:08:07

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.225.57.49

    등록