방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [J Clin Oncol.] Improved Survival With Prostate Radiation in Addition to Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Men With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

    University of Colorado School of Medicine/ Chad G. Rusthoven*

  • 출처
    J Clin Oncol.
  • 등재일
    2016 Aug 20
  • 저널이슈번호
    34(24):2835-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4788. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    There is growing interest in the role of local therapies, including external beam radiotherapy (RT), for men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of men with mPCa treated with androgen deprivation (ADT) with and without prostate RT.

     

    METHODS:

    The NCDB was queried for men with newly diagnosed mPCa, all treated with ADT, with complete datasets for RT, surgery, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses.

     

    RESULTS:

    From 2004 to 2012, 6,382 men with mPCa were identified, including 538 (8.4%) receiving prostate RT. At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the addition of prostate RT to ADT was associated with improved OS on univariate (P < .001) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.551 to 0.706; P < .001) adjusted for age, year, race, comorbidity score, PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy administration, treating facility, and insurance status. Propensity score analysis with matched baseline characteristics demonstrated superior median (55 v 37 months) and 5-year OS (49% v 33%) with prostate RT plus ADT compared with ADT alone (P < .001). Landmark analyses limited to long-term survivors of ≥1, ≥3, and ≥5 years demonstrated improved OS with prostate RT in all subsets (all P < .05). Secondary analyses comparing the survival outcomes for patients treated with therapeutic dose RT plus ADT versus prostatectomy plus ADT during the same time interval demonstrated no significant differences in OS, whereas both therapies were superior to ADT alone.

     

    CONCLUSION:

    In this large contemporary analysis, men with mPCa receiving prostate RT and ADT lived substantially longer than men treated with ADT alone. Prospective trials evaluating local therapies for mPCa are warranted. 

     

    Author information

    Rusthoven CG1, Jones BL2, Flaig TW2, Crawford ED2, Koshy M2, Sher DJ2, Mahmood U2, Chen RC2, Chapin BF2, Kavanagh BD2, Pugh TJ2.

    1Chad. G. Rusthoven, Bernard L. Jones, Thomas W. Flaig, E. David Crawford, Brian D. Kavanagh, and Thomas J. Pugh, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Matthew Koshy, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine; Matthew Koshy, The University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; David J. Sher, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas; Usama Mahmood and Brian F. Chapin University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Ronald C. Chen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. chad.rusthoven@ucdenver.edu.

    2Chad. G. Rusthoven, Bernard L. Jones, Thomas W. Flaig, E. David Crawford, Brian D. Kavanagh, and Thomas J. Pugh, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Matthew Koshy, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine; Matthew Koshy, The University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; David J. Sher, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas; Usama Mahmood and Brian F. Chapin University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Ronald C. Chen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

     

  • 편집위원

    stage IV에서 local RT가 survival benefit이 있음을 보여준 논문으로, 향후 practice changing한 결과로 이어질 수 있음

    2016-09-02 10:27:14

  • 편집위원2

    전이성 종양에서 국소치료의 효과를 확인하는 연구로서 환자의 생존기간에도 도움이 되며 국소치려의 역할 확장에도 근거가 될 수 있는 흥미로운 연구입니다.

    2016-09-02 10:27:14

  • 편집위원3

    Prostate cancer는 biologically 느리게 진행하는 종양으로, stage IV에서 local Tx가 의미가 있는지 evidence가 거의 없었기 때문에, 임상에서 치료 방향을 결정하기가 어렵고, 기관별 다양성이 많았습니다.

    2016-09-02 10:27:14

  • 편집위원3

    위 논문을 근거로 적극적인 치료를 시행할 수 있을 것으로 생각됩니다.

    2016-09-02 10:27:14

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.145.131.238

    등록