의학물리학

본문글자크기
  • [Med Phys.] RECORDS: improved Reporting of montE CarlO RaDiation transport Studies: Report of the AAPM Research Committee Task Group 268.

    Radboud University Medical Center / Ioannis Sechopoulos*

  • 출처
    Med Phys.
  • 등재일
    2018 Jan
  • 저널이슈번호
    45(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.1002/mp.12702. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Studies involving Monte Carlo simulations are common in both diagnostic and therapy medical physics research, as well as other fields of basic and applied science. As with all experimental studies, the conditions and parameters used for Monte Carlo simulations impact their scope, validity, limitations, and generalizability. Unfortunately, many published peer-reviewed articles involving Monte Carlo simulations do not provide the level of detail needed for the reader to be able to properly assess the quality of the simulations. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group #268 developed guidelines to improve reporting of Monte Carlo studies in medical physics research. By following these guidelines, manuscripts submitted for peer-review will include a level of relevant detail that will increase the transparency, the ability to reproduce results, and the overall scientific value of these studies. The guidelines include a checklist of the items that should be included in the Methods, Results, and Discussion sections of manuscripts submitted for peer-review. These guidelines do not attempt to replace the journal reviewer, but rather to be a tool during the writing and review process. Given the varied nature of Monte Carlo studies, it is up to the authors and the reviewers to use this checklist appropriately, being conscious of how the different items apply to each particular scenario. It is envisioned that this list will be useful both for authors and for reviewers, to help ensure the adequate description of Monte Carlo studies in the medical physics literature.

     


    Author information

    Sechopoulos I1,2, Rogers DWO3, Bazalova-Carter M4, Bolch WE5, Heath EC3, McNitt-Gray MF6, Sempau J7, Williamson JF8.
    1
    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
    2
    Dutch Expert Centre for Screening (LRCB), Wijchenseweg 101, Nijmegen, SW, 6538, The Netherlands.
    3
    Physics Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
    4
    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
    5
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
    6
    Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
    7
    Physics Department and Institute of Energy Technologies, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
    8
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

  • 키워드
    Monte Carlo simulation; diagnosis; guidelines; publication; radiation transport; radiotherapy
  • 편집위원

    MC에 대한 의학 분야에서의 적절한 사용과 결과 분석 및 보고를 위한 가이드라인이 절실한 상황에서 적절한 발표물임

    2018-02-14 16:30:58

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 44.200.175.255

    등록