방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Clin Cancer Res.] Differentiation between Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Progression Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer.

    Sunnybrook Research Institute/ Hatef Mehrabian*

  • 출처
    Clin Cancer Res.
  • 등재일
    2017 Jul 15
  • 저널이슈번호
    23(14):3667-3675. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2265. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

     

    Abstract

    Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment used in patients with brain metastases and is associated with high rates of local control, however, at the risk of radiation necrosis. It is difficult to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumor progression using conventional MRI, making it a major diagnostic dilemma for practitioners. This prospective study investigated whether chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) was able to differentiate these two conditions.Experimental Design: Sixteen patients with brain metastases who had been previously treated with SRS were included. Average time between SRS and evaluation was 12.6 months. Lesion type was determined by pathology in 9 patients and the other 7 were clinically followed. CEST imaging was performed on a 3T Philips scanner and the following CEST metrics were measured: amide proton transfer (APT), magnetization transfer (MT), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and area under the curve for CEST peaks corresponding to amide and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE).Results: Five lesions were classified as progressing tumor and 11 were classified as radiation necrosis (using histopathologic confirmation and radiographic follow-up). The best separation was obtained by NOEMTR (NOEMTR,necrosis = 8.9 ± 0.9%, NOEMTR,progression = 12.6 ± 1.6%, P < 0.0001) and AmideMTR (AmideMTR,necrosis = 8.2 ± 1.0%, AmideMTR,progression = 12.0 ± 1.9%, P < 0.0001). MT (MTnecrosis = 4.7 ± 1.0%, MTprogression = 6.7 ± 1.7%, P = 0.009) and NOEAUC (NOEAUC,necrosis = 4.3 ± 2.0% Hz, NOEAUC,progression = 7.2 ± 1.9% Hz, P = 0.019) provided statistically significant separation but with higher P values.Conclusions: CEST was capable of differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases. Both NOEMTR and AmideMTR provided statistically significant separation of the two cohorts. However, APT was unable to differentiate the two groups. 

     

    Author information

    Mehrabian H1,2, Desmond KL2, Soliman H3,4, Sahgal A2,3,4, Stanisz GJ5,2,6.

    1Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. hatef.mehrabian@sri.utoronto.ca.2Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.3Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.5Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.6Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University, Lublin, Poland. 

     

  • 편집위원

    방사선치료 후 방사선치료에 의한 괴사는 종양의 재발과 구분하는 것이 중요하지만 어렵다. 그래서 이러한 구분이 가능방법을 찾기 위한 노력은 계속되어야 할 것이다.

    2017-08-03 14:34:18

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 13.59.130.130

    등록