핵의학

본문글자크기
  • 2019년 04월호
    [Clin Nucl Med.] The New Possibility of Lymphoscintigraphy to Guide a Clinical Treatment for Lymphedema in Patient With Breast Cancer.림포신티그라피로 림프부종 치료방침결정

    서울의대 / 서관식, 서민석, 정광표*

  • 출처
    Clin Nucl Med.
  • 등재일
    2019 Mar
  • 저널이슈번호
    44(3):179-185. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002443.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    OBJECTIVES:
    Lymphedema is a chronic disease that occurs frequently after breast cancer treatment. For the treatment of lymphedema, surgical approach such as vascularized lymph node transfer and super-microscopic lymphovenous anastomosis surgery is well established. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) and sympathetic ganglion block (SGB) are two non-surgical therapeutic options. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lymphoscintigraphy in guiding the selection of the optimal non-surgical treatment in lymphedema.

    METHODS:
    A total of 81 lymphedema patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and were treated with CDT or SGB were retrospectively evaluated. The parameters for the lymphoscintigraphic findings included the extent of dermal backflow (small extent/large extent groups), the level of lymphatic flow (trunk flow pattern/upper arm-restricted pattern/forearm-restricted pattern groups), and the visualization of lymph nodes (visualized/non-visualized groups). The change in the circumferential difference between the two sides of the body at the upper arm and forearm was used as the clinical outcome variable. Paired comparison and group comparison analysis were conducted.

    RESULTS:
    Of 81 patients, 41 received CDT and 40 received SGB. There were no significant differences in demographic data between the CDT and SGB groups. Both CDT and SGB had a significant therapeutic effect. Upper arm edema was more significantly reduced after SGB than after CDT in the small extent group (P = 0.004), the forearm-restricted pattern group (P = 0.002), and the non-visualized group (P = 0.018). In the other groups, SGB and CDT showed comparable therapeutic effects without statistical differences.

    CONCLUSION:
    SGB was found to have a better therapeutic effect in the lymphedema patients with specific lymphoscintigraphic findings compared with CDT. Lymphoscintigraphy may be helpful in selecting the appropriate approach to lymphedema treatment. Further well-designed prospective studies are warranted to validate the findings of this study.

     


    Author information

    Seo KS1, Suh M2, Hong S3, Cheon GJ2, Lee SU4, Jung GP1.
    1
    From the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine and.
    2
    Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul.
    3
    Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul.
    4
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

  • 편집위원

    림프부종 환자에서 Lymphoscintigraphy의 임상적 의미를 밝힌 임상연구로 Lymphoscintigraphy 영상의 가치를 높이고 personalized medicine에서 활용 가능성을 높인 연구로 유방암 관련 임상가 및 핵의학 전문가에게 관심을 끌 수 있는 연구로 보임.

    덧글달기2019-04-17 15:59:06

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.138.175.180

    등록