방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Yonsei Med J .] Short-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness between Long-Course Chemoradiation and Short-Course Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

    [Yonsei Med J .] Short-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness between Long-Course Chemoradiation and Short-Course Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

    연세의대 / 조민수, 배현우, 김남규*

  • 출처
    Yonsei Med J .
  • 등재일
    2023 Jun
  • 저널이슈번호
    64(6):395-403. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0042.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Purpose: Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) has been widely recommended in a majority of rectal cancer patients. Recently, encouraging data on short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) for rectal cancer has emerged. In this study, we aimed to compare these two methods in terms of short-term outcomes and cost analysis under the Korean medical insurance system.

    Materials and methods: Sixty-two patients with high-risk rectal cancer, who underwent either SCRT or LCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME), were classified into two groups. Twenty-seven patients received 5 Gy×5 with two cycles of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² every 3 weeks) followed by TME (SCRT group). Thirty-five patients received capecitabine-based LCRT followed by TME (LCRT group). Short-term outcomes and cost estimation were assessed between the two groups.

    Results: Pathological complete response was achieved in 18.5% and 5.7% of patients in the SCRT and LCRT groups, respectively (p=0.223). The 2-year recurrence-free survival rate did not show significant difference between the two groups (SCRT vs. LCRT: 91.9% vs. 76.2%, p=0.394). The average total cost per patient for SCRT was 18% lower for inpatient treatment (SCRT vs. LCRT: $18787 vs. $22203, p<0.001) and 40% lower for outpatient treatment (SCRT vs. LCRT: $11955 vs. $19641, p<0.001) compared to LCRT. SCRT was shown to be the dominant treatment option with fewer recurrences and fewer complications at a lower cost.

    Conclusion: SCRT was well-tolerated and achieved favorable short-term outcomes. In addition, SCRT showed significant reduction in the total cost of care and distinguished cost-effectiveness compared to LCRT.

     

     

     

    Affiliations

    Min Soo Cho 1, Hyeon Woo Bae 1, Jee Suk Chang 2, Seung Yoon Yang 1, Tae Hyun Kim 3, Woong Sub Koom 2, Sang Joon Shin 4, Gyu-Seog Choi 5, Nam Kyu Kim 6
    1The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    2Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    3Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
    4The Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    5The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
    6The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. namkyuk@yuhs.ac.

  • 키워드
    Rectal cancer; cost effectiveness; long-course chemoradiation; short course radiotherapy.
  • 연구소개
    고위험 직장암의 치료에 있어서 Long-course chemoradiation 및 전 직장간막 절제술 (Total mesorectal excision)은 표준 치료법으로 자리잡았습니다. 그러나 최근 유럽에서는 직장암 환자들에게 수술 전 Long-course chemoradiotheray를 대신하여 short-course radiotherapy와 systemic chemotherapy를 적용하여 더 높은 반응률과 질병 관련 치료 실패율을 보여주었습니다. 하지만 아직 국내에서는 short-course radiotherapy에 대한 임상 데이터가 부족한 상황입니다. 본 연구에서는 고위험 직장암에 대한 두 가지 치료 전략 (Systemic chemotherapy와 short-course radiotherapy 또는 Long-course chemoradiotherapy 후 수술) 의 부작용, 수술 후 결과 및 비용 추정의 결과를 비교하여 분석하였습니다. Short-course radiotherapy는 환자들이 잘 견뎌낼 수 있었고, 수술 후 단기 결과도 우수하게 나타났으며, Long-course chemoradiotherapy와 비교하여 비용 대비 효과적인 치료 방법으로 입증되었습니다.
  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.138.114.38

    등록