방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Cancer Res Treat.] Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil Receiving Postoperative Ipsilateral Versus Bilateral Neck Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis (KROG 11-07).

    2017년 11월호
    [Cancer Res Treat.] Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil Receiving Postoperative Ipsilateral Versus Bilateral Neck Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis (KROG 11-07).

    국립암센터 / 김영경, 조관호*

  • 출처
    Cancer Res Treat.
  • 등재일
    2017 Oct
  • 저널이슈번호
    49(4):1097-1105. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.425. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >


     

    Figure 1. Comparison of the 5-year overall survival (OS) (A), disease-free survival (DFS) (B), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) (C), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (D) rates between the ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (INRT) and bilateral neck radiotherapy (BNRT) groups defined by propensity-score matching.

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    The impact of postoperative ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (INRT) versus bilateral neck radiotherapy (BNRT) on the clinical outcomes of patients with tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma was analyzed retrospectively.

     

    MATERIALS AND METHODS:

    Between October 2001 and June 2012, 241 patients with T1-2 and N0-N2b tonsillar carcinoma from 16 institutes underwent postoperative INRT (n=84) or BNRT (n=157) following a tonsillectomy. Seventy patients were identified from each group by propensity score matching and compared in terms of the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test.

     

    RESULTS:

    The median follow-up was 55 months (range, 3 to 133 months). The survival outcomes in the INRT and BNRT groups were similar: 5-year OS (92.8% vs. 94.0%, p=0.985), DFS (80.5% vs. 94.2%. p=0.085), LRRFS (88.1% vs. 97.1%, p=0.083), and DMFS (92.7% vs. 97.0%, p=0.370). Subgroup analysis revealed no contralateral neck recurrence in 61 patients with T1-2N0-2a regardless of the treatment groups. For 79 patients with N2b, contralateral neck recurrence was more common in the INRT group than in the BNRT group (7.9% vs. 0.0%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.107). The overall grade ≥ 2 toxicities were lower in the INRT group: acute (45.7% vs. 74.3%, p=0.001) and late (4.3% vs. 31.4%, p < 0.001), respectively.


    CONCLUSION:

    INRT is an attractive strategy for patients with T1-2N0-2a tonsillar carcinoma compared to BNRT. For patients with N2b, there was a small risk of contralateral neck recurrence when treated with INRT, but its impact on the OS was limited with successful salvage treatment.

     

    Author information

    Kim Y1, Cho KH1, Moon SH1, Lee CG2, Keum KC2, Lee SW3, Ahn YC4, Oh D4, Kim YS5, Won YK5, Wu HG6, Hah JH7, Oh YT8.

    Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

    Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. 

  • 키워드
    Adjuvant radiotherapy; Ipsilateral neck; Radiation volume; Tonsillar neoplasms; Toxicity​
  • 연구소개
    KROG 11-07 다기관 데이터베이스를 이용하여 편도선암(T1-2N0-2bM0)환자 241명을 대상으로 수술 후 방사선치료 시, 동측과 양측 방사선치료 결과를 후향적으로 propensity score matching 분석하였음. 양 군간에 5년 생존율(92.8% vs. 94%, p=0.985), 무병생존율(80.5% vs. 94.2%. p=0.085), 국소지역무병생존율(88.1% vs. 97.1%, p=0.083), 및 전이무병생존율 (92.7% vs. 97.0%, p=0.370)로 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었음. 하지만 N2b 환자에서 동측만 치료한 경우 양측 치료한 경우보다 반대측 림프절 재발 (7.9% vs. 0%)로 높았으나, 적절한 구제치료로 생존율에는 영향이 없었음. 방사선치료 독성은 급성 (45.7% vs. 74.3%, p=0.001), 만성 (4.3% vs. 31.4%, p < 0.001)으로 동측만 치료 경우 빈도가 적었음. 결론적으로, T1-2N2aM0 편도선 암은 동측 경부만 치료해도 좋으며, N2b 환자에서는 동측만 치료할 경우 반대 측 재발 확률이 8% 정도로, 양측 치료 또는 동측 치료 후 재발하면 구제치료가 선택 가능한 옵션으로 생각됨.
  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.145.191.169

    등록