방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [J Clin Oncol] Role of Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Yale University School of Medicine / Roy H. Decker*

  • 출처
    J Clin Oncol
  • 등재일
    2015 Dec 20
  • 저널이슈번호
    33(36):4240-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4270. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract


    PURPOSE:

    To investigate outcomes for elderly patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the modern era by using a large national database.

     

    PATIENTS AND METHODS:

    Elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer clinical stage I to III who received CT or CRT were identified in the National Cancer Data Base between 2003 and 2011. Hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression with clustering by reporting facility was performed to identify factors associated with treatment selection. Overall survival (OS) of patients receiving CT versus CRT was compared by using the log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching.

     

    RESULTS:

    A total of 8,637 patients were identified, among whom 3,775 (43.7%) received CT and 4,862 (56.3%) received CRT. The odds of receiving CRT decreased with increasing age, clinical stage III disease, female sex, and the presence of medical comorbidities (all P < .01). Use of CRT was associated with increased OS compared with CT on univariable and multivariable analysis (median OS, 15.6 v 9.3 months; 3-year OS, 22.0% v 6.3%; log-rank P < .001; Cox P < .001). Propensity score matching identified a matched cohort of 6,856 patients and confirmed a survival benefit associated with CRT (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.55; P < .001). Subset analysis of CRT treatment sequence showed that patients alive 4 months after diagnosis derived a survival benefit with concurrent CRT over sequential CRT (median OS, 17.0 v 15.4 months; log-rank P = .01).

     

    CONCLUSION:

    In elderly patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, modern CRT appears to confer an additional OS advantage beyond that achieved with CT alone in a large population-based cohort. Our findings suggest that CRT should be the preferred strategy in elderly patients who are expected to tolerate the toxicities of the combined approach. 

     

     

    Author information

    Corso CD1, Rutter CE1, Park HS1, Lester-Coll NH1, Kim AW1, Wilson LD1, Husain ZA1, Lilenbaum RC1, Yu JB1, Decker RH2.

    1 All authors: Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

    2 All authors: Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. roy.decker@yale.edu. 

  • 편집위원

    최근노인암환자에서 치료 방법이 화두입니다. 과거에는 기대여명이 짧기 때문에 완화적 요법으로 치료를 진행했다면, 최근 평균 수명의 증가와 치료의 발전으로 적극적인 치료가 의미가 있지 않을까 하는 의견이 대두되고 있는데, 그런 측면에서 노인환자에서도 chemotherapy alone 보다는 CCRT가 생존율 향상에 도움이 된다는 현 논문은 의미가 있다고 하겠습니다.

    2016-01-05 10:55:30

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.21.76.0

    등록