방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Lancet Oncol] Dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of radiation-induced pain flare after palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

    Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre / Edward Chow*

  • 출처
    Lancet Oncol.
  • 등재일
    2015 Nov
  • 저널이슈번호
    16(15):1463-72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00199-0. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    BACKGROUND:

    Pain flare occurs after palliative radiotherapy, and dexamethasone has shown potential for prevention of such flare. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone with that of placebo in terms of reduction of incidence of pain flare.

    METHODS:
    In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, patients from 23 Canadian centres were randomly allocated (1:1) with a web-based system and minimisation algorithm to receive either two 4 mg dexamethasone tablets or two placebo tablets taken orally at least 1 h before the start of radiation treatment (a single 8 Gy dose to bone metastases; day 0) and then every day for 4 days after radiotherapy (days 1-4). Patients were eligible if they had a non-haematological malignancy and bone metastasis (or metastases) corresponding to the clinically painful area or areas. Patients reported their worst pain scores and opioid analgesic intake before treatment and daily for 10 days after radiation treatment. They completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life QLQ-C15-PAL, the bone metastases module (EORTC QLQ-BM22), and the Dexamethasone Symptom Questionnaire at baseline, and at days 10 and 42 after radiation treatment. Pain flare was defined as at least a two-point increase on a scale of 0-10 in the worst pain score with no decrease in analgesic intake, or a 25% or greater increase in analgesic intake with no decrease in the worst pain score from days 0-10, followed by a return to baseline levels or below. Primary analysis of incidence of pain flare was by intention-to-treat (patients with missing primary data were classified as having pain flare). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01248585, and is completed.

    FINDINGS:
    Between May 30, 2011, and Dec 11, 2014, 298 patients were enrolled. 39 (26%) of 148 patients randomly allocated to the dexamethasone group and 53 (35%) of 150 patients in the placebo group had a pain flare (difference 8·9%, lower 95% confidence bound 0·0, one-sided p=0·05). Two grade 3 and one grade 4 biochemical hyperglycaemic events occurred in the dexamethasone group (without known clinical effects) compared with none in the placebo group. The most common adverse events were bone pain (61 [41%] of 147 vs 68 [48%] of 143), fatigue (58 [39%] of 147 vs 49 [34%] of 143), constipation (47 [32%] of 147 vs 37 [26%] of 143), and nausea (34 [23%] of 147 vs 34 [24%] of 143), most of which were mild grade 1 or 2.

    INTERPRETATION:
    Dexamethasone reduces radiation-induced pain flare in the treatment of painful bone metastases.

    FUNDING:
    The NCIC CTG's programmatic grant from the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute​

     

    Author information
    Chow E1, Meyer RM2, Ding K3, Nabid A4, Chabot P5, Wong P6, Ahmed S7, Kuk J8, Dar AR9, Mahmud A10, Fairchild A11, Wilson CF3, Wu JS12, Dennis K13, Brundage M14, DeAngelis C15, Wong RK16.
    1Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Edward.Chow@sunnybrook.ca.
    2Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
    3NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
    4Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
    5Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada.
    6Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
    7CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
    8Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Grand River Hospital, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
    9London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada.
    10Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada.
    11Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
    12Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
    13Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
    14Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
    15Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
    16Princess Margaret Hospital, Radiation Medicine Program, Ontario Cancer Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

  • 편집위원

    chemotherapy and target agent 개발로 생존율이 증가하는 상황에서 WBRT에 의한 morbidity 때문에 예전에 비해 brain metastases에 대해서 WBRT가 의뢰되는 건수가 줄었습니다.

    2015-12-10 11:02:34

  • 편집위원

    이런 현실을 반영하여 supportive care와 WBRT의 유용성을 비교하는 현 논문은 내과 및 방사선종양학과 의사들에게 큰 영향을 미칠 것으로 생각됩니다.

    2015-12-10 11:02:34

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.17.154.171

    등록