방사선방호 및 안전

본문글자크기
  • [Health Phys .] Enhanced Dosimetric Accuracy Using Quality Factor Compensation Method for In Vivo Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Tooth Dosimetry전자상자성공명분석 기술기반 치아선량 직접측정법의 Quality Factor 보상법을 이용한 선량평가 정확도 향상 연구

    서울대 / 최권, 예성준*

  • 출처
    Health Phys .
  • 등재일
    2023 Nov 1
  • 저널이슈번호
    125(5):352-361.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    We aim to develop a dose assessment method compensating for quality factors (Q factor) observed during in vivo EPR tooth dosimetry. A pseudo-in-vivo phantom made of tissue-equivalent material was equipped with one each of four extracted human central incisors. A range of Q factors was measured at tooth-depths of -2, 0, and 2 mm in the pseudo-in-vivo phantom. In addition, in vivo Q factors were measured from nine human volunteers. For the dose-response data, the above four sample teeth were irradiated at 0, 1, 2, 5, and 10 Gy, and the radiation-induced signals were measured at the same tooth-depths using an in vivo EPR tooth dosimetry system. To validate the method, the signals of two post-radiotherapy patients and three unirradiated volunteers were measured using the same system. The interquartile range of the Q factors measured in the pseudo-in-vivo phantom covered that observed from the human volunteers, which implied that the phantom represented the Q factor distribution of in vivo conditions. The dosimetric sensitivities and background signals were decreased as increasing the tooth-depth in the phantom due to the decrease in Q factors. By compensating for Q factors, the diverged dose-response data due to various Q factors were converged to improve the dosimetric accuracy in terms of the standard error of inverse prediction (SEIP). The Q factors of patient 1 and patient 2 were 98 and 64, respectively, while the three volunteers were 100, 92, and 99. The assessed doses of patient 1 and patient 2 were 2.73 and 12.53 Gy, respectively, while expecting 4.43 and 13.29 Gy, respectively. The assessed doses of the unirradiated volunteers were 0.53, 0.50, and - 0.22 Gy. We demonstrated that the suggested Q factor compensation could mitigate the uncertainty induced by the variation of Q factors.

     

    Affiliations

    Kwon Choi 1, Chang Uk Koo 1, Jeonghun Oh 1, Jiwon Kim 2, Jong In Park 3, Sung Hwan Kim 4, Jong Hoon Lee 4, Dae Gyu Kang 4, Sung-Joon Ye
    1Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
    2Department of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
    3Ionizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Korea.
    4Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon 16247, Korea.

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.221.146.223

    등록