방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Gut Liver .] Chemoembolization versus Radiotherapy for Single Hepatocellular Carcinomas of ≤3 cm Unsuitable for Image-Guided Tumor Ablation

    울산의대 / 임지혜, 김의창, 심주현*

  • 출처
    Gut Liver .
  • 등재일
    2024 Jan 15
  • 저널이슈번호
    18(1):125-134. doi: 10.5009/gnl230080. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Background/aims: Local ablation therapy (LAT) is primarily recommended for solitary inoperable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) of ≤3 cm in diameter. However, only two-thirds of uninodular small HCCs are suitable for LAT, and the second-best treatment option for managing these nodules is unclear. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of chemoembolization and radiotherapy in small HCCs unsuitable for LAT.

    Methods: The study included 651 patients from a tertiary referral center who underwent planning sonography for LAT. These patients had 801 solitary HCCs of ≤3 cm in diameter and were treated with LAT, chemoembolization, or radiotherapy. Local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival and overall survival (OS) were measured according to the type of treatment of the index nodule.

    Results: LAT, chemoembolization, and radiotherapy were used to treat 561, 185, and 55 nodules in 467, 148, and 36 patients, respectively. LTP-free survival was significantly shorter in patients treated with chemoembolization than for those treated with LAT (multivariate hazard ratio [HR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61 to 3.47) but not for those treated with radiotherapy (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.83). However, OS was not affected by treatment modality. Matching and weighting analyses confirmed that radiotherapy gave comparable results to chemoembolization in terms of OS despite better LTP-free survival (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.13 to 7.47 and HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.11 to 8.48, respectively).

    Conclusions: Our data suggest that chemoembolization and radiotherapy are equally effective options for single small HCCs found to be unsuitable for LAT after sonographic planning. Betterfit indications for each procedure should be established by specifically designed studies.

     

     

    Affiliations

    Jihye Lim 1 2, Euichang Kim 2, Sehee Kim 3, So Yeon Kim 4, Jin Hyoung Kim 4, Sang Min Yoon 5, Ju Hyun Shim 2
    1Department of Gastroenterology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
    2Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    3Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    4Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    5Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

  • 키워드
    Chemoembolization; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Progression-free survival; Radiofrequency ablation; Radiotherapy; therapeutic.
  • 편집위원

    수술 불가능한 3 cm 이하의 단일 간세포암에서 항암화학색전술과 방사선치료 결과를 비교 분석한 연구로, 방사선치료가 항암화학색전술 보다 국소제어 측면에서는 장점이 있었으나 전체생존율 측면에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았음을 보고함.

    2024-03-07 12:23:50

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.143.17.128

    등록