글로벌 연구동향
방사선종양학
- 2026년 09월호
[Oncology .] Emergency Department Visits after Radiotherapy in Patients with Solid Malignancies: Analysis of Causality and Severity고형암환자에서 방사선치료후 응급실 방문 원인 및 중증도 분석 연구고려의대 / 박석민, 윤원섭*
- 출처
- Oncology .
- 등재일
- 2026 Jul 10:1-10.
- 저널이슈번호
- 내용
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to characterize emergency department (ED) visits after radiotherapy (RT) and to assess the causality and severity of these visits.Methods: Patients who received RT for solid malignancies from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The study period for ED visits was defined from the start of RT to 3 months after the completion of RT. Causes of ED visits were classified as (1) cancer treatment-related causes, (2) RT-related causes, (3) cancer-related causes, and (4) other medical conditions, and the degree of relevance for each cause was assessed as (1) certain, (2) probable, (3) possible, or (4) unlikely. Severity was graded using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). Acuity at ED presentation was categorized by KTAS grade: grades 1-2 as high, grade 3 as moderate, and grades 4-5 as low. Predictors related to strong relevance (certain and probable) for each cause and to severe events were examined using binary logistic regression. A p value <0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results: A total of 177 patients presented to the ED, and 192 ED visits were evaluated. The thoracic site was the most frequent primary site, and 67.2% of cases were stage III/IV. KTAS 3, indicating urgency, was the most common, accounting for 64.1%. The degree of relevance to RT-related causes was positively correlated with KTAS grade (r = 0.253, p < 0.001). The proportions of ED visits with strong relevance for cancer treatment-related, RT-related, cancer-related, and other medical conditions were 62.5%, 41.1%, 16.1%, and 38.0%, respectively. Among causes with strong relevance, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (OR: 4.24, p < 0.001) and curative RT (OR: 3.23, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with cancer treatment-related and RT-related causes, respectively. Severe events were more frequently observed with thoracic primary tumors (OR: 3.01, p = 0.005), intervals >30 days after RT (OR: 2.60, p = 0.016), and age ≥65 years (OR: 2.37, p = 0.022).
Conclusion: Patients with identified risk factors require close and continuous follow-up after RT to reduce severe ED presentations.
Affiliations
Sunmin Park 1, Sungwoo Moon 2, Jong-Hak Park 2, Jungsun Kim 3, Jungyoon Choi 3, Chai Hong Rim 1, Won Sup Yoon 4
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
3Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea, irionyws@korea.ac.kr.
- 키워드
- Emergency service; Hospital; Korean triage and acuity scale; Neoplasms; Radiotherapy.
- 덧글달기
- 이전글 [Medicine (Baltimore) .] Prognostic factors and outcomes associated with postmastectomy radiation therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy for breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study
- 다음글 [Clin Transl Radiat Oncol .] Impact of salvage treatment for recurrent medulloblastoma in previously irradiated patients (KROG 23-02): A multi-institutional retrospective study





