방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • 2026년 05월호
    [ESMO Open .] A randomized phase III clinical trial of weekly versus tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: results of the TACO (GCIG/KGOG 1027/THAI 2012) study

    KIRAMS, Mahidol University / 유상영*, Sarikapan Wilailak*

  • 출처
    ESMO Open .
  • 등재일
    2026 Mar 10
  • 저널이슈번호
    11(4):106102.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Background: The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy; however, the optimal dose and dosing schedule of cisplatin remain debated. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 versus those of tri-weekly cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 during radiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

    Patients and methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 314 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer, randomly assigning them in a 1 : 1 ratio into two arms. The weekly arm received a weekly dose of 40 mg/m2 cisplatin for six cycles, whereas the tri-weekly arm received a tri-weekly dose of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin for three cycles, both concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoints included 3-year recurrence-free survival according to a superiority design, with P < 0.05 indicative of statistical significance. Overall survival, toxicity profiles, and quality of life (QOL) were also analyzed.

    Results: Chemotherapy delay was more frequent in the weekly arm than in the tri-weekly arm (P = 0.008). However, the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate between the two arms did not significantly differ (78.7% in the weekly arm, 84.1% in the tri-weekly arm; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.32, P = 0.28). The pattern of recurrence did not differ significantly between the two arms. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities occurred less frequently in the tri-weekly arm (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the tri-weekly arm had better QOL scores across several domains compared with the weekly arm.

    Conclusion: In this study, tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy was not statistically superior to a weekly schedule in terms of survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the tri-weekly regimen exhibited a more favorable toxicity profile and improved QOL compared with the weekly regimen. These results suggest tri-weekly cisplatin administration as a feasible alternative for chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer.

     

     

     

    Affiliations

    S Y Ryu 1, B H Nam 2, M H Kim 3, W I Jang 4, C Sitathanee 5, T D Linh 6, K H Lee 7, W M Lee 8, E T Kim 9, S B Kang 10, J H Kim 11, J Y Park 12, K B Lee 13, C H Cho 14, H Lou 15, Y H Kim 16, Y T Kim 17, Y H Lee 18, X Wu 19, J W Kim 20, S I Park 21, S Jeon 22, D H Thinh 6, S F Kry 23, D Gaffney 24, W Small 25, S Wilailak 26
    1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ryu@kcch.re.kr.
    2Data Management Center, Korea Gynecologic Oncology Group, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    3Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    4Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    5Department of Radiation Oncology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
    6Department of Radiation Oncology, Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
    7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
    10Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hosan Women's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    11Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    12Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    13Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon.
    14Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
    15Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zheijiang Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China.
    16Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    17Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    18Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
    19Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
    20Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    21Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Science, Busan, Republic of Korea.
    22Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
    23Department of Radiation Physics, IROC Houston QA Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
    24Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
    25Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, USA.
    26Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: sarikapanw@gmail.com.

  • 키워드
    cervical cancer; chemoradiotherapy; cisplatin; quality of life; tri-weekly; weekly.
  • 편집위원

    진행성 자궁경부암에서 cisplatin based CCRT는 표준치료로 시행되고 있지만 cisplatin을 매주 시행하는 것과 3주마다 시행하는 것 중 어는 것이 더 좋은지 불명확한 상황에서 phase 3 임상시험을 진행하였고, 비록 1차 목표인 3년 recurrence-free survival에 있어서는 양군간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었지만, 3주마다 시행하는 군에서 치료독성이 적고 QOL이 좋다는 결과는 임상 진료시 참고가 되겠습니다.

    덧글달기2026-05-06 18:23:05

  • 편집위원2

    본 연구는 국소 진행성 자궁경부암 환자를 대상으로 방사선 치료와 병행하는 시스플라틴 항암화학요법의 주 1회 투여(40 mg/m²)와 3주 1회 투여(75 mg/m²) 간의 치료 효과 및 안전성을 비교 평가한 3상 전향적 무작위 임상시험임. 314명의 환자를 두 그룹으로 배정하여 치료를 시행한 결과, 1차 평가지표인 3년 무재발 생존율은 주 1회 투여군(78.7%)과 3주 1회 투여군(84.1%) 간에 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았으나, 수치상 3주 1회 투여군에서 더 높게 나타남. 특히 3주 1회 투여군은 주 1회 투여군에 비해 항암 치료 지연이 유의미하게 적어 안정적인 치료 연속성을 확보했으며, 3 및 4등급의 중증 혈액학적 독성 발생률이 현저히 낮아(P < 0.001) 우수한 안전성을 입증함. 추가로 분석된 환자의 삶의 질(QOL) 평가에서도 여러 도메인에 걸쳐 더 높은 점수를 기록하여 환자의 주관적 치료 만족도 역시 뛰어남.
    본 연구는 국소 진행성 자궁경부암 환자에게 3주 1회 시스플라틴 요법을 적용하는 것이 기존 주 1회 요법과 대등한 수준의 생존율을 유지하면서도, 중증 부작용 발생을 크게 억제하고 환자의 전반적인 삶의 질을 확연히 보존하는 탁월한 장점이 있음을 보여줌. 이러한 결과는 3주 1회 요법이 단순한 대안을 넘어, 치료 순응도를 극대화하고 환자의 신체적·심리적 부담을 최소화할 수 있는 매우 안전하고 효과적인 치료 옵션으로서 임상 현장에서 적극적으로 고려될 수 있는 강력한 근거를 제시함.

    덧글달기2026-05-06 18:35:28

  • 편집위원3

    무작위 3상시험은 주기별 치료 효과와 독성을 직접 비교한 근거 수준이 높아, 실제 임상 표준 치료 결정에 과학적 타당성을 제공함

    덧글달기2026-05-06 19:17:20

  • 편집위원 4

    다기관 다국적 연구로 장기간에 걸친 phase 3 연구를 성공적으로 마치고 결과를 발표하신 것에 대한 연구 소개가 많은 독자들에게 도움이 될 것 같습니다.

    덧글달기2026-05-07 15:39:05

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.97.14.90

    등록