방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • 2025년 11월호
    [Cancers (Basel) .] Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    KIRAMS / 배선현, 김미숙*

  • 출처
    Cancers (Basel) .
  • 등재일
    2025 Sep 10
  • 저널이슈번호
    17(18):2959.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Background: The optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of LAPC in the modern era. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were about for LAPC treated with curative-intent modern RT techniques including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and particle beam therapy (PBT) until September 2024. Results: In total, 53 observational studies, encompassing 2548 patients (993 treated with IMRT, 998 with SBRT, and 557 with PBT), met the inclusion criteria. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was implemented in 28 studies, including only 3 studies in the SBRT group. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was adopted in 22%. The pooled 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25-34%) for all patients, with no significant differences among RT techniques: 28% (95% CI, 22-34%) for IMRT, 26% (95% CI, 19-34%) for SBRT, and 43% (95% CI, 28-57%) for PBT (p = 0.1121). The pooled rate of acute hematologic toxicity (HT) ≥ grade 3 was 17% (95% CI, 9-26%), with significant differences among RT techniques: 23% (95% CI, 9-40%) for IMRT, 4% (95% CI, 0-11%) for SBRT, and 20% (95% CI, 6-37%) for PBT (p = 0.0181). In addition, CCRT (p = 0.0084) and ENI (p = 0.0145) significantly increased the risk of acute HT. Gastrointestinal toxicities rarely occurred. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed similar efficacy among modern RT techniques for LAPC management. Since almost all studies have single-arm design, and chemotherapy regimens have changed over time, conclusions must be drawn with caution. The use of modern RT techniques is individually selected according to clinical practice and resource availability.

     

     

    Affiliations

    Sun Hyun Bae 1, Won Il Jang 2, Jeong Il Yu 3, Hee Chul Park 3, Ji Eun Moon 4, Karin Haustermans 5, Marta Scorsetti 6 7, Morten Høyer 8, Mi Sook Kim 2
    1Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
    2Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea.
    3Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
    4Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
    5Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
    6Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
    7Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy.
    8Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.

  • 키워드
    intensity-modulated radiotherapy; modern radiotherapy; pancreatic cancer; particle beam therapy; stereotactic radiotherapy.
  • 연구소개
    국소 진행성 췌장암에서 최신 방사선치료 기법인 IMRT, SBRT, particle beam therapy의 성적을 분석한 메타분석으로 과거에 비해서는 향상되었지만 최신 항암치료제 단독요법과 비교하면 제한적인 면에서 앞으로 추가 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.
  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.97.14.85

    등록