방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • 2024년 07월호
    [Front Oncol .] The impact of the new ESTRO-ACROP target volume delineation guidelines for postmastectomy radiotherapy after implant-based breast reconstruction on breast complications

    서울의대 / 박정빈, 신경환*

  • 출처
    Front Oncol .
  • 등재일
    2024 May 23:14:1373434. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.137
  • 저널이슈번호
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) updated a new target volume delineation guideline for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on breast complications with the new guideline compared to the conventional guidelines. In total, 308 patients who underwent PMRT after tissue expander or permanent implant insertion from 2016 to 2021 were included; 184 received PMRT by the new ESTRO-ACROP target delineation (ESTRO-T), and 124 by conventional target delineation (CONV-T). The endpoints were major breast complications (infection, necrosis, dehiscence, capsular contracture, animation deformity, and rupture) requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization and any grade ≥2 breast complications. With a median follow-up of 36.4 months, the cumulative incidence rates of major breast complications at 1, 2, and 3 years were 6.6%, 10.3%, and 12.6% in the ESTRO-T group, and 9.7%, 15.4%, and 16.3% in the CONV-T group; it did not show a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.56). In multivariable analyses, target delineation is not associated with the major complications (sHR = 0.87; p = 0.77). There was no significant difference in any breast complications (3-year incidence, 18.9% vs. 23.3%, respectively; p = 0.56). Symptomatic RT-induced pneumonitis was developed in six (3.2%) and three (2.4%) patients, respectively. One local recurrence occurred in the ESTRO-T group, which was within the ESTRO-target volume. The new ESTRO-ACROP target volume guideline did not demonstrate significant differences in major or any breast complications, although it showed a tendency of reduced complication risks. As the dosimetric benefits of normal organs and comparable oncologic outcomes have been reported, further analyses with long-term follow-up are necessary to evaluate whether it could be connected to better clinical outcomes.

     

     

    Affiliations

    Jung Bin Park 1 2, Bum-Sup Jang 1 2, Ji Hyun Chang 1 2, Jin Ho Kim 1 2, Chang Heon Choi 1, Ki Young Hong 3, Ung Sik Jin 3, Hak Chang 3, Yujin Myung 4, Jae Hoon Jeong 4, Chan Yeong Heo 4, In Ah Kim 5, Kyung Hwan Shin 1 2 6
    1Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    2Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    3Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
    5Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
    6Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    PMID: 38846971
     

  • 키워드
    breast cancer; breast implant; breast reconstruction; implant complication; radiotherapy; radiotherapy adverse effects; target delineation.
  • 편집위원

    보형물을 이용한 유방재건 환자의 방사선치료 타겟을 보형물 전체를 포함하는 경우 (통상적 타겟)와 보형물의 앞쪽만을 포함하는 경우 (새로 제안된 ESTRO 타겟)로 나누어 분석하였을 때, ESTRO 타겟이 주요합병증 및 전체합병증이 낮은 경향성은 있었으나 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었음을 보고함.

    덧글달기2024-07-02 17:09:30

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.97.14.80

    등록