방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [J Breast Cancer.] Comparison of Recurrence Rate Between Re-Excision With Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy-Only Groups in Surgical Margin Involvement of In Situ Carcinoma

    성균관의대 / 이준희, 채병주*

  • 출처
    J Breast Cancer.
  • 등재일
    2022 Aug
  • 저널이슈번호
    25(4):288-295. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e36.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    Purpose: Surgical margin status is a surrogate marker for residual tumors after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rates between re-excision combined with radiotherapy (excision with RTx) and RTx alone, following the confirmation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the resection margin after BCS, has not been reported previously. Therefore, in the present study, the clinical characteristics of DCIS involvement in the surgical resection margin between excision with RTx and RTx alone were investigated, and the IBTR rate was compared.

    Methods: We analyzed 8,473 patients treated with BCS followed by RTx between January 2013 and December 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on surgical resection margin status in permanent pathology, and superficial and deep margins were excluded. Patients who underwent re-excision with DCIS confirmed in the resection margin were identified and the IBTR rate was examined.

    Results: Among 8,473 patients treated with BCS, 494 (5.8%) had positive surgical resection margins. The median follow-up period was 47 months. Among the 494 patients with a positive resection margin, 368 (74.5%) had residual DCIS at the surgical resection margin in the final pathology. Among those with confirmed DCIS at the resection margin, 24 patients (6.5%) were re-excised, and 344 patients (93.5%) underwent RTx after observation. The IBTR rates were 4.2% and 1.2% in the re-excision and observation groups, respectively. IBTR-free survival analysis revealed no significant difference between the excision with RTx and RTx-only groups (p = 0.262).

    Conclusion: The IBTR rate did not differ between the excision with RTx and RTx-only groups when DCIS was confirmed at the resection margins. This suggests that RTx and close observation without re-excision could be an option, even in cases where minimal involvement of DCIS is confirmed on surgical resection.

     

     

     

    Affiliations

    Jun-Hee Lee  1 , Hyunjun Lee  1 , Yoon Ju Bang  1 , Jai Min Ryu  1 , Se Kyung Lee  1 , Jonghan Yu  1 , Jeong Eon Lee  1 , Seok Won Kim  1 , Seok Jin Nam  1 , Byung Joo Chae  2
    1 Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    2 Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bj.chae@samsung.com.

  • 키워드
    Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; Margins of Excision; Mastectomy, Segmental; Radiotherapy; Recurrence.
  • 편집위원

    유방암으로 유방보존수술 후 절제연에 관상피내암이 있을 때, 추가 절제가 필요한지를 후향적으로 분석한 논문. 추가 절제 후 방사선치료를 시행한 군과 추가 절제 없이 방사선치료를 시행한 군을 비교하였고, 국소재발률의 차이를 보이지 않아 추가 절제 없이 방사선치료만 시행하는 것이 치료적 옵션이 될 수 있음을 제안함.

    2022-10-05 14:45:50

  • 편집위원2

    단일기관 후향적 연구이지만 수술 후 절제연에서 DCIS (+)일 때 재수술 없이 방사선치료를 시행해도 동측 유방 재발율이 낮다는 것을 보여주는 흥미로운 연구입니다.

    2022-10-05 16:31:36

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.222.125.171

    등록