방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Sci Rep.] Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma

    이화의대, 한양의대 / 김경수, 정광호, 김규보*, 박혜진*

  • 출처
    Sci Rep.
  • 등재일
    2021 Feb 2
  • 저널이슈번호
    11(1):2785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82541-5.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract
    We evaluated the inter-physician variability in the target contouring of the radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Clinical target volume (CTV) of three patients diagnosed with ASCC was delineated by seven experienced radiation oncologists from multi-institution. These patients were staged as pT1N1a, cT2N0, and cT4N1a, respectively, according to 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). The maximum distance from the boundaries of the STAPLE generated volume with confidence level of 80% to those of the contour of each CTV in 6 directions was compared. CTV of pelvis which includes primary tumor, perirectal tissue and internal/external iliac lymph node (LN) area (CTV-pelvis) and CTV of inguinal area (CTV-inguinal) were obtained from the seven radiation oncologists. One radiation oncologist did not contain inguinal LN area in the treatment target volume of patient 2 (cT2N0 stage). CTV-inguinal displayed moderate agreement for each patient (overall kappa 0.58, 0.54 and 0.6, respectively), whereas CTV-pelvis showed substantial agreement (overall kappa 0.66, 0.68 and 0.64, respectively). Largest variation among each contour was shown in the inferior margin of the CTV-inguinal. For CTV-pelvis, anterior and superior margin showed the biggest variation. Overall, moderate to substantial agreement was shown for CTV delineation. However, large variations in the anterior and cranial boarder of the CTV-pelvis and the caudal margin of the CTV-inguinal suggest that further studies are needed to establish a clearer target volume delineation guideline.

     

     

    Affiliations

    Kyung Su Kim #  1   2 , Kwang-Ho Cheong #  3 , Kyubo Kim  4 , Taeryool Koo  3 , Hyeon Kang Koh  5 , Ji Hyun Chang  6 , Ah Ram Chang  7 , Hae Jin Park  8
    1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Republic of Korea.
    2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea.
    3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
    4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea. kyubokim.ro@gmail.com.
    5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    7 Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    8 Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea. haejinpark@hanyang.ac.kr.
    # Contributed equally.

  • 연구소개
    항문암에서 표적체적에 대한 가이드라인이 몇 가지 발표되어 있으나, 여전히 예방적 림프절 조사를 위한 표적체적의 경계에 대해서는 명확하지 않은 부분이 있으며, 임상의사 및 기관의 방침에 따라서도 차이가 존재할 수 있다. 이에 3개의 항문암 증례에 대해 7명의 임상의사가 그린 임상표적체적을 분석하여 inter-physician variability를 평가하였다. 전반적으로 moderate to substantial agreement(overall kappa value 0.54-0.68)를 보였으나, 골반림프절의 anterior/cranial margin와 서혜부림프절의 caudal margin은 상대적으로 큰 변이를 보여주었다.
  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 13.58.150.59

    등록