방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • [Surgery.] Is lateral pelvic node dissection necessary after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer patients with initially suspected lateral pelvic node?

    국립암센터 / 김민주, 박성찬, 김태현*

  • 출처
    Surgery.
  • 등재일
    2016 Aug
  • 저널이슈번호
    160(2):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 24.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Little is known about the effect of lateral pelvic node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy on rectal cancer patients with initially suspected lateral pelvic nodes. The purpose of this study was to identify a subgroup of patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy who can benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection.

     

    METHODS:

    The study included 580 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The lateral pelvic node responses to preoperative chemoradiotherapy were divided: group I (no suspected lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node <5 mm pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy; group II (responsive lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node ≥5 mm pre-chemoradiotherapy but <5 mm post-chemoradiotherapy; and group III (persistent lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node ≥5 mm pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy. Prognostic factors for lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed.

     

    RESULTS:

    In a multivariate analysis, lateral pelvic node response was an independent factor associated with lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival (P < .05). Group III had significantly poorer lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival than groups II and I (74.1%, 93.4%, and 98.6%; 71.7%, 89.4%, and 97%; 56.9%, 76.6%, and 81.7%; 74.9%, 85.7%, and 89.1%, respectively; P < .05). Group II tended to have poorer lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival than group I, and the differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival between the 2 groups were not significant (P > .05).

     

    CONCLUSION:

    Our data suggest that the subgroup with lateral pelvic nodes responsive to preoperative chemoradiotherapy may not benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection, and the subgroup with persistent lateral pelvic node may benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection. 

     

    Author information

    Kim MJ1, Chan Park S1, Kim TH2, Kim DY1, Kim SY1, Baek JY1, Chang HJ1, Park JW1, Oh JH1.

    1Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

    2Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: k2onco@naver.com.

     

  • 편집위원

    본 논문은 직장암의 수술전 항암방사선치료 후 lateral pelvic node의 치료와 관련된 오랜 논쟁에 관한 연구이다.

    2016-09-02 10:35:01

  • 편집위원

    Lateral pelvic node dissection은 비뇨생식기 부작용을 야기할 수 있고, 수술전 항암방사선치료 및 total mesorectal excision을 시행한 환자에서는 그 효용성이 검증이 되지 않았기 때문에 어떤 환자군에

    2016-09-02 10:35:01

  • 편집위원

    시행되어야 하는지에 관한 많은 논쟁이 있어왔다. 본 연구에서는 수술전 5mm이상의 lateral node가 항암방사선치료 후 5mm 이하로 크기가 작아진 경우 수술로 이를 제거하지 않아도 된다는 결론을 내리고 있다.

    2016-09-02 10:35:01

  • 편집위원

    또한 항암방사선치료 후에도 5mm이상의 큰 림프절이 남아 있는 경우 생존율이 불량하여 수술적으로 제거해야 할지도 모른다는 제안을 함으로써 추가 연구에 대한 필요성을 제시하고 있다.

    2016-09-02 10:35:01

  • 편집위원

    본 연구는 많은 임상 의사가 의문을 품고 있는 직장암의 치료 방침에 대한 명쾌한 결론을 내린 연구로 의미가 크며 향후 전향적 연구에서 검증이 필요한 제안을 남김으로써 후속연구에 도움이 크다고 할 수 있다.

    2016-09-02 10:35:01

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 18.226.93.207

    등록