방사선종양학

본문글자크기
  • 2016년 03월호
    [J Clin Oncol.] Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

    Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI./ Mary Feng*

  • 출처
    J Clin Oncol.
  • 등재일
    2016 Feb
  • 저널이슈번호
    10;34(5):452-9.
  • 내용

    바로가기  >

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    Data guiding selection of nonsurgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. We therefore compared outcomes between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for HCC.

     

    PATIENTS AND METHODS:

    From 2004 to 2012, 224 patients with inoperable, nonmetastatic HCC underwent RFA (n = 161) to 249 tumors or image-guided SBRT (n = 63) to 83 tumors. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for imbalances in treatment assignment. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and toxicity were retrospectively analyzed.

     

    RESULTS:

    RFA and SBRT groups were similar with respect to number of lesions treated per patient, type of underlying liver disease, and tumor size (median, 1.8 v 2.2 cm in maximum diameter; P = .14). However, the SBRT group had lower pretreatment Child-Pugh scores (P = .003), higher pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein levels (P = .04), and a greater number of prior liver-directed treatments (P < .001). One- and 2-year FFLP for tumors treated with RFA were 83.6% and 80.2% v 97.4% and 83.8% for SBRT. Increasing tumor size predicted for FFLP in patients treated with RFA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54 per cm; P = .006), but not with SBRT (HR, 1.21 per cm; P = .617). For tumors ≥ 2 cm, there was decreased FFLP for RFA compared with SBRT (HR, 3.35; P = .025). Acute grade 3+ complications occurred after 11% and 5% of RFA and SBRT treatments, respectively (P = .31). Overall survival 1 and 2 years after treatment was 70% and 53% after RFA and 74% and 46% after SBRT.

     

    CONCLUSION:

    Both RFA and SBRT are effective local treatment options for inoperable HCC. Although these data are retrospective, SBRT appears to be a reasonable first-line treatment of inoperable, larger HCC.

     

    Author information

    Wahl DR1, Stenmark MH1, Tao Y1, Pollom EL1, Caoili EM1, Lawrence TS1, Schipper MJ1, Feng M2.

    1Daniel R. Wahl, Matthew H. Stenmark, Yebin Tao, Erqi L. Pollom, Elaine M. Caoili, Theodore S. Lawrence, Matthew J. Schipper, and Mary Feng, University of Michigan Medical Center; and Matthew H. Stenmark, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.

    2Daniel R. Wahl, Matthew H. Stenmark, Yebin Tao, Erqi L. Pollom, Elaine M. Caoili, Theodore S. Lawrence, Matthew J. Schipper, and Mary Feng, University of Michigan Medical Center; and Matthew H. Stenmark, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI. maryfeng@med.umich.edu. 

     

  • 덧글달기
    덧글달기
       IP : 3.14.15.94

    등록